Jump to content

NJ Power Private News


Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, GardenStateBaller said:

Which is a crock. BC should be rewarded for scheduling IMG and Mass, not penalized! Same goes for DBP (Hoban) and SJR (SFA). 

Agreed! Don't penalize the Big 3 because they have to venture out of state to fill their schedule. It's not their fault no one will play them in-state. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Omaha Vol said:

Agreed! Don't penalize the Big 3 because they have to venture out of state to fill their schedule. It's not their fault no one will play them in-state. 

I think the problem has to do with how NJ would cross-reference OOS teams.  The state has the stats for all NJ teams, but doesn't know the stats for the OOS teams.  So they solve the problem by ignoring it...

Edited by elKakador
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, elKakador said:

I think the problem has to do with how NJ would cross-reference OOS teams.  The state has the stats for all NJ teams, but doesn't know the stats for the OOS teams.  So they solve the problem by ignoring it...

They should omit those games then rather them penalizing them as losses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2024 at 9:34 AM, MickeyBern said:

Yeah but at least they are seeded by committee. This has some weight but is not the determining factor

The seeding by committee comes into play, I think, because of the OOS games played by the non-pubs.

If a non-pub plays a couple of OOS games and wins against strong competition, this is is gonna weigh more than an undefeated non-pub who plays only in-state competition, which isn't as strong, but has more power points because the the number of games played against teams that yield power points.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, elKakador said:

The seeding by committee comes into play, I think, because of the OOS games played by the non-pubs.

If a non-pub plays a couple of OOS games and wins against strong competition, this is is gonna weigh more than an undefeated non-pub who plays only in-state competition, which isn't as strong, but has more power points because the the number of games played against teams that yield power points.

Exactly   that is what I'm saying. If the season ended today with those Power Points the committee would still make BC #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MickeyBern said:

Exactly   that is what I'm saying. If the season ended today with those Power Points the committee would still make BC #1.

Not exactly, right now St Augustine has more power points.  But BC would be seeded higher by the committee because of its win over Massillon, even thought BC got no power points for this win...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, elKakador said:

Not exactly, right now St Augustine has more power points.  But BC would be seeded higher by the committee because of its win over Massillon, even thought BC got no power points for this win...

We are playing word game you & I. That is what I'm saying. Bottom line, the committee would use their collective heads and make BC #1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...